Skip to content

NO VACCINE

poison_signAs a mother of a now 28 year old son with Asperger’s Syndrome, I can attest to the fact that vaccines are the cause of his life-long difficulties. Can I prove it? As far as I’m concerned, there is enough evidence and scores of scientific documents that have done that already.  The problem is, it’s the same old story of denial coming from the people who profit from their proliferation. You will never get them to admit the vaccines caused neurological damage because guilt would precipitate lawsuits with reparations in the billions. Now, the H1N1 vaccine comes with impunity. Shouldn’t that tell us something about its safety?

For those of you who may think this is just a conspiracy theory or fear-mongering, there is more than enough evidence out there to convince any person with their critical thinking skills intact that the government doesn’t always act in the best interest of the citizens.

“In 1955 The CIA, in an experiment to test its ability to infect human populations with biological agents, releases a bacteria withdrawn from the Army’s biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Fl.” http://www.healthnewsnet.com/humanexperiments.html

And that is just one example of many. Our troops have typically been scapegoats for such experimentation and have suffered greatly from things like the Gulf War Syndrome. Recently, reports have been coming through alternative news regarding severe side effects experienced by some of our military after they were given the vaccine. It is reported that two of the soldiers have died from complications.

I have also been in contact with Dr. Michael Pece, the Arizona Naturopathic doctor and former radio host, who was one of the first to speak out about chemtrail contamination. He is now concerned about the H1N1 vaccine. In our last correspondence, he stated:

“I am convinced it [H1N1 virus] is man-made in a military lab (4 different viruses in one?)…that has never occurred in nature before. And now they are really pushing the flu vaccine on people through fear. The vaccine is more dangerous than the H1N1. Do not fall for the propaganda. Stay away from the vaccine, it is a killer, the flu is not.”

I agree, Dr. Mike. There is enough truth out there to decide in favor of resistance.

DON’T TAKE THE SHOT!

Although I do not necessarily support Ron Paul’s campaign, I felt his comments on this video were appropriate to add to this page.  I agree that the government should not interfere in the public’s right of choice over vaccinations.

Great video from Alex Jones’ infowars.  A MUST SEE:

***

MUST SEE!

My friend Trish sent me this video.  It is, without a doubt, the most comprehensive summary of the H1N1 global situation ever produced (my opinion).  It is difficult to keep up, but definitely worth the effort.  Send it to friends, family – anyone you can.  We must resist this life and death scenario!  Click on the link below.

http://vimeo.com/7298827

***

Today, I am extremely sad.  I have recently returned from a wedding in the Dominican Republic and met and vacationed with my daughter-in-law’s family and friends.  I was very impressed with one young man named Conrad, who was extremely polite, attended not one, but TWO church services, loves the Lord and is respectful to adults.  A rarity.

Recently, I discovered that despite my daughter-in-law’s warning not to take the H1N1 vaccine to her family and friends (I warned her and my son), her sister’s family and this young man had been vaccinated.  What I was dismayed to learn was that Conrad’s personality changed so dramatically afterwards that he is now in a regimented home for troubled youth.  He is despondent, acting erractically, and pushed his mother.  I have no doubt it was the vaccine.  God help us and protect us from the evil of the day.

Please, Christian!  Tell everyone you know.  The vaccine IS the pandemic!

 

SPREAD THE WORD!

*****

LIKE SHEEP…

I was waiting in the prescription line at my local drug store as my husband took his seat in the waiting area along with several elderly men awaiting their H1N1 vaccinations.  I thought as I watched them that there were probably none who had access to the Internet and the information available on the dangers of the vaccine.

The propaganda machine had done its job well.  The scene overwhelmed me as I stepped forward in line and felt helpless as the pharmacy tech injected the first senior with what I believe is a toxic brew.  I glanced at my husband, but neither of us knew what to do.  I felt a mixture of helplessness and anger but it would be useless to speak up now.  We had been warning everyone we knew, but we couldn’t reach them all.  The following are facts regarding the particular vaccine, Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine that they are using in my particular area:

From the Monovalent Vaccine insert page 11

11.  Description:

Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine, an inactivated influenza virus vaccine, for intramuscular use, is prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. The virus-containing allantoic fluid is harvested and inactivated with formaldehyde. Influenza virus is concentrated and purified in a linear sucrose density gradient solution using a continuous flow centrifuge. The virus is then chemically disrupted using a non-ionic surfactant, polyethylene glycol p-isooctylphenyl ether (Triton® X-100), producing a “split virus”. The split virus is further purified and then suspended in sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution…

Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is formulated to contain 15 mcg hemagglutinin (HA) of influenza A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) v-like virus per 0.5 mL dose. Gelatin 0.05% is added as a stabilizer. Each 0.5 mL dose may contain residual amounts of formaldehyde (not more than 100 mcg), polyethylene glycol p-isooctylphenyl ether (not more than 0.02%), and sucrose (not more than 2.0%)…

There is no thimerosal used in the manufacturing process of the single-dose presentations of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine. The multi-dose presentation of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine contains thimerosal, a mercury derivative, added as a preservative. Each 0.5 mL dose of the multidose presentation contains 25 mcg mercury.

I really don’t know if they are administering single or multi-doses at our neighborhood pharmacies.  Do some research and ask your pharmacist.

Under 3. DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

4) Multi-dose vial, 5 mL, for 6 months of age and older, contains thimerosal, a mercury 13 derivative, added as a preservative. Each 0.5 mL dose contains 25 micrograms (mcg) mercury.

Below:  Thimerasol (mercury) Exposure Calculator from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.  Great tool to check your vulnerability to the mercury in the vaccine.  Remember, the dosage in a 0.5 mL is 25 mcg mercury:

http://www.vaccine-tlc.org/calc.html

13.  NON-CLINICAL TOXOLOGY

13.1  Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

Neither Fluzone vaccine nor influenza A(H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.

(In other words, they have no idea how it will affect your health in the future – or do they?  Why take a chance on cancer or sterilization?)

***

So first let’s deal with the ingredients in this particular vaccine:

THIMEROSAL

Mercury is a neurotoxin.

The battle will continue between Big Pharma and those who believe they and their children have been harmed by this mercury .  Since my son received an accidental  “double dose” as a child and became autistic, I am one of them.

“The link between thimerosal and autism and other learning disabilities has continued to be argued for decades. Thimerosal is 49.6% ethylmercury and was widely used since the 1940s in over the counter drugs. After being banned in 1998 from over the counter drugs, thimerosal is still found in some vaccines. Mercury is the second most toxic substance known to man behind uranium.”

“A press release about Mercury in Thimerosal from the National Vaccine Information Center in July of 1999 press points out that, “The cumulative effects of ingesting mercury can cause brain damage.” During this same month, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) alerted the public about the possible health effects associated with thimerosal-containing vaccines. These health-related organizations strongly recommended that thimerosal be removed from vaccines as soon as possible. Under the directive of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, the Food and Drug Administration also determined that infants who received several thimerosal-containing vaccines may be receiving mercury exposure over and above the recommended federal guidelines.”  Thimerosal – News http://www.thimerosal-news.com/

FORMALDEHYDE

Formaldehyde:CH2O Attenuating agent, Preservative, Disinfectant, Fixative

Aust. National Research Council: fewer than 20% but perhaps more than 10% of the general population may be susceptible to formaldehyde and may react acutely at any exposure level.  More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems, on at least 8 federal regulatory lists, ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health (Environmental Defense Fund)

Formalyn a 37 percent solution of gaseous formaldehyde which includes methanol.(Used in vaccines as a tissue fixative)  Formaldehyde solution (formalin) is considered a hazardous compound, and its vapor toxic.

Wikidepia.com —  Large formaldehyde exposures, for example from drinking formaldehyde solutions, are potentially lethal. Formaldehyde is converted to formic acid in the body, leading to a rise in blood acidity, rapid, shallow breathing, hypothermia, and coma or death. People who have ingested formaldehyde require immediate medical attention.  In the body, formaldehyde can cause proteins to irreversibly bind to DNA. Laboratory animals exposed to large doses of inhaled formaldehyde over their lifetimes have developed more cancers of the nose and throat than are usual, as have workers in particle-board sawmills… Formaldehyde is classifed as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and as a known human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formaldehyde

10. “New discovery shows why vaccines can cause adverse reactions”
“Formalin, used in the manufacture of over half of all vaccines… causes chemical damage to vaccine proteins and creates reactive chemical groups called carbonyls…. the presence of carbonyls can mean that the immune system overreacts once infection occurs and attacks the body in a damaging way. In the 1960s, carbonyls in experimental vaccines for a virus known as RSV, which causes wheezy colds in children, triggered a powerful immune response that caused severe side effects leading to hospitalisation and several deaths. ”
Stephenson, A, Imperial College London — 8/23/2006

11. “A potential molecular mechanism for hypersensitivity caused by formalin-inactivated vaccines”
“Heat, oxidation and exposure to aldehydes create reactive carbonyl groups on proteins, targeting antigens to scavenger receptors. Formaldehyde is widely used in making vaccines, but has been associated with atypical enhanced disease during subsequent infection with paramyxoviruses.”
Amin Moghaddam, Nature Medicine – 12, 905 – 907 — 7/23/2006

12. “Mortality From Lymphohematopoietic Malignancies Among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries”
“Conclusions: Exposure to formaldehyde may cause leukemia, particularly myeloid leukemia, in humans.”
Hauptmann M, et al, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 21, 1615-1623, — 11/5/2003

13. “Effect of formaldehyde on the expression of adhesion molecules in nasal microvascular endothelial cells: the role of formaldehyde in the pathogenesis of sick building syndrome”
“BackgroundFormaldehyde is associated with sick building syndrome (SBS), a set of diffuse and irritative symptoms predominantly involving the eyes and the respiratory tract. However, its pathophysiological mechanism in SBS has not yet been clarified. ConclusionThese in vitro studies suggest that formaldehyde may play a role as the irritant of the nasal mucosa…”
W. J. Kim, et al, Clinical & Experimental Allergy Volume 32 Page 287 — 2/1/2002

14. “Embryo toxicity and teratogenicity of formaldehyde.”
“Pregnant rats were exposed (to Formaldehyde) (a) prior to mating, (b) during mating, (c) or during the entire gestation period. These regimens (a) increased embryo mortality; (b) increased fetal anomalies (i.e., cryptochordism and aberrant ossification centers); (c) decreased concentrations of ascorbic acid; and (d) caused abnormalities in enzymes of mitochondria, lysosomes, and the endoplasmic reticulum.”
Thrasher JD, et al, Arch Environ Health; 56(4): 300-11 — 7/1/2001

15. “Effects of intravenous administration of formaldehyde on platelet and coagulation variables in healthy horses”
“Infusion of higher doses of formaldehyde resulted in adverse effects including muscle fasciculations, tachycardia, tachypnea, serous ocular and nasal discharge, agitation, and restlessness.”
Erin L. Taylor, et al, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Vol. 61, No. 10, Pages 1191-1196 — 10/1/2000

***

GLYCOL P-ISOOCTYLPHENYL ETHER (TRITON® X-100):

From WAVE (World Association for Vaccine Education)

4. “Vaccinations Myth and Risks – Flu vaccine is worthless and damaging”
“Some companies use polyethylene glycol and Isooctylphenyl for various reasons when producing the (vaccine’s) subvirion. Such chemicals cannot produce health. Polyethylene Glycol is a relative of ethylene glycol (antifreeze) which is often used to poison dogs and other predators of sheep. The body has a very difficult time expelling it because it is resistant to biodegradation.”  Vivian Virginia Vetrano, D.C. hM.D.,M.D.,PH.D.,  — 1/1/1900

http://www.novaccine.com/vaccine-ingredients/results.asp?sc=244

3. “YOUNT: Another side to flu shots: Guest writer spreading word about dangers that are glossed over”
“The biggest problem you face with flu shots is that you are being injected with a number of toxic additives. How would you like to have antifreeze injected into your body? Don’t worry, they call it ethylene glycol…makes it sound better doesn’t it? Or formaldehyde? (to kill viruses). Here’s the best one — a mercury derivative called Thimerosal (used as a preservative).” Yount Jr., Luther B., News and Tribune — 11/8/2006

SUMMARY:

Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine contains

  • Formaldehyde (toxic)
  • Polyethylene glycol p-isooctylphenyl ether (Triton® X-100) (anti-freeze – toxic)
  • In the multi-dose, Thimerasol (mercury – toxic)

For more information, check out:

http://www.novaccine.com/vaccine-ingredients/results.asp?sc=7

OTHER “PRO” SOURCES:

From the CDC

“Licensed 2009 H1N1 monovalent vaccines will be produced using the same manufacturing process as seasonal influenza vaccines. All seasonal influenza vaccines licensed in the United States are produced in eggs and they do not contain adjuvants.”

From Drugs.com

“As with the seasonal influenza vaccines, the 2009 H1N1 vaccines are being produced in formulations that contain thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, and in formulations that do not contain thimerosal.”

Look at the facts and decide for yourselves. Your health, possibly your life and the lives of others depends upon it.  Take care of yourself, pray, and SPREAD THE WORD!

References:

Vaccine insert page:  http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM182404.pdf

CDC:  http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/safety_planning.htm

Drugs.com: http://www.drugs.com/influenza-a-h1n1-2009-monovalent-vaccine.html

Thimerosal – News http://www.thimerosal-news.com/

*****

Thousands of Americans died from H1N1 even after receiving vaccine shots

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) The CDC is engaged in a very clever, statistically devious spin campaign, and nearly every journalist in the mainstream media has fallen for its ploy. No one has yet reported what I’m about to reveal here.

It all started with the CDC’s recent release of new statistics about swine flu fatalities, infection rates and vaccination rates. According to the CDC:

• 61 million Americans were vaccinated against swine flu (about 20% of the U.S. population). The CDC calls this a “success” even though it means 4 out of 5 people rejected the vaccines.

• 55 million people “became ill” from swine flu infections.

• 246,000 Americans were hospitalized due to swine flu infections.

• 11,160 Americans died from the swine flu.

Base on these statistics, the CDC is now desperately urging people to get vaccinated because they claim the pandemic might come back and vaccines are the best defense.

But here’s the part you’re NOT being told.

The CDC statistics lie by omission. They do not reveal the single most important piece of information about H1N1 vaccines: How many of the people who died from the swine flu had already been vaccinated?

Many who died had already been vaccinated

The CDC is intentionally not tracking how many of the dead were previously vaccinated. They want you (and mainstream media journalists) to mistakenly believe that ZERO deaths occurred in those who were vaccinated. But this is blatantly false. Being vaccinated against H1N1 swine flu offers absolutely no reduction in mortality from swine flu infections.

And that means roughly 20% of the 11,160 Americans who died from the swine flu were probably already vaccinated against swine flu. That comes to around 2,200 deaths in people who were vaccinated!

How do I know that swine flu vaccines don’t reduce infection mortality? Because I’ve looked through all the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials that have ever been conducted on H1N1 vaccines. It didn’t take me very long, because the number of such clinical trials is ZERO.

That’s right: There is not a single shred of evidence in existence today that scientifically supports the myth that H1N1 vaccines reduce mortality from H1N1 infections. The best evidence I can find on vaccines that target seasonal flu indicates a maximum mortality reduction effect of somewhere around 1% of those who are vaccinated. The other 99% have the same mortality rate as people who were not vaccinated.

So let’s give the recent H1N1 vaccines the benefit of the doubt and let’s imagine that they work just as well as other flu vaccines. That means they would reduce the mortality rate by 1%. So out of the 2,200 deaths that took place in 2009 in people who were already vaccinated, the vaccine potentially may have saved 22 people.

61 million injections add up to bad public health policy

So let’s see: 61 million people are injected with a potentially dangerous vaccine, and the actual number “saved” from the pandemic is conceivably just 22. Meanwhile, the number of people harmed by the vaccine is almost certainly much, much higher than 22. These vaccines contain nervous system disruptors and inflammatory chemicals that can cause serious health problems. Some of those problems won’t be evident for years to come… future Alzheimer’s victims, for example, will almost certainly those who received regular vaccines, I predict.

Injecting 61 million people with a chemical that threatens the nervous system in order to avoid 22 deaths — and that’s the best case! — is an idiotic public health stance. America would have been better off doing nothing rather than hyping up a pandemic in order to sell more vaccines to people who don’t need them.

Better yet, what the USA could have done that would have been more effective is handing out bottles of Vitamin D to 61 million people. At no more cost than the vaccines, the bottles of vitamin D supplements would have saved thousands of lives and offered tremendously importantly additional benefits such as preventing cancer and depression, too.

The one question the CDC does not want you to ask

Through its release of misleading statistics, the CDC wants everyone to believe that all of the people who died from H1N1 never received the H1N1 vaccine. That’s the implied mythology behind the release of their statistics. And yet they never come right out and say it, do they? They never say, “None of these deaths occurred in patients who had been vaccinated against H1N1.”

They can’t say that because it’s simply not true. It would be a lie. And if that lie were exposed, people might begin to ask questions like, “Well gee, if some of the people who were killed by the swine flu were already vaccinated against swine flu, then doesn’t that mean the vaccine doesn’t protect us from dying?”

That’s the number one question that the CDC absolutely, positively does not want people to start asking.

So they just gloss over the point and imply that vaccines offer absolute protection against H1N1 infections. But even the CDC’s own scientists know that’s complete bunk. Outright quackery. No vaccine is 100% effective. In fact, when it comes to influenza, no vaccine is even 10% effective at reducing mortality. There’s not even a vaccine that’s 5% effective. And there’s never been a single shred of credible scientific information that says a flu vaccine is even 1% effective.

So how effective are these vaccines, really? There are a couple thousand vaccinated dead people whose own deaths help answer that question: They’re not nearly as effective as you’ve been led to believe.

They may not be effective at all.

Crunching the numbers: Why vaccines just don’t add up

Think about this: 80% of Americans refused to get vaccinated against swine flu. That’s roughly 240 million people.

Most of those 240 million people were probably exposed to the H1N1 virus at some point over the last six months because the virus was so widespread.

How many of those 240 million people were actually killed by H1N1? Given the CDC’s claimed total of deaths at 11,160, if you take 80% of that (because that’s the percentage who refused to be vaccinated), you arrive at 8,928. So roughly 8,900 people died out of 240 million. That’s a death rate among the un-vaccinated population of .0000372

With a death rate of .0000372, the swine flu killed roughly 1 out of every 26,700 people who were NOT vaccinated. So even if you skipped the vaccine, you had a 26,699 out of 26,700 chance of surviving.

Those are pretty good odds. Ridiculously good. You have a 700% greater chance of being struck by lightning in your lifetime, by the way.

What it all means is that NOT getting vaccinated against the swine flu is actually a very reasonable, intelligent strategy for protecting your health. Mathematically, it is the smarter play.

Because, remember: Some of the dead victims of H1N1 got vaccinated. In fact, I personally challenge the CDC to release statistics detailing what percentage of the dead people had previously received such vaccines.

The headline to this article, “Thousands of Americans died from H1N1 even after receiving vaccine shots” is a direct challenge to the CDC, actually. If the CDC believes this headline is wrong — and that the number of vaccinated Americans who died from H1N1 is zero — then why don’t they say so on the record?

The answer? Because they’d be laughed right out of the room. Everybody who has been following this with any degree of intelligence knows that the H1N1 vaccine was a medical joke from the start. There is no doubt that many of those who died from H1N1 were previously vaccinated. The CDC just doesn’t want you to know how many (and they hope you’ll assume it’s zero).

Where are all the real journalists?

I find it especially fascinating that the simple question of “How many of the dead were previously vaccinated?” has never been asked in print by a single journalist in any mainstream newspaper or media outline across the country. Not the NY Times, not WashingtonPost.com, not the WSJ, LA Times or USA Today. (At least, not that I’m aware of. If you find one that does, let me know and I’ll link to their article!)

Isn’t there a single journalist in the entire industry that has the journalistic courage to ask this simple question of the CDC? Why do these mainstream journalists just reprint the CDC’s statistics without asking a single intelligent question about them?

Why is all the intelligent, skeptical reporting about H1N1 found only in the alternative press or independent media sites?

You already know the answer, but I’ll say it anyway: Because most mainstream media journalists are just part of the propaganda machine, blindly reprinting distorted statistics from “authorities” without ever stopping to question those authorities.

The MSM today, in other words, is often quite pathetic. Far from the independent media mindset that used to break big stories like Watergate, today’s mainstream media is little more than a mouthpiece for the corporatocracy that runs our nation. The MSM serves the financial interests of the corporations, just as the CDC and WHO do. That’s why they’re all spouting the same propaganda with their distorted stories about H1N1 swine flu.

But those who are intelligent enough to ask skeptical questions about H1N1 already realize what an enormous con the pandemic was. In the end, it turned out to be a near-harmless virus that was hyped up by the CDC, WHO and drug companies in order to sell hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines that are now about to be dumped down the drain as useless.

Sources for this story include:
CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/…

Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy…

******

NEW INVESTIGATION ON THE H1N1 VACCINE

I have been warning about the H1N1 vaccine since I began this blog.  Since I have a son with Asperger’s Syndrome who had been damaged by a double dose of MMR baccine, I did my research when this new vaccine appeared.  The hype was incredible, the propaganda extensive, and the ‘fear factor’ a pivotal point of coercion.  When it smells like a rat, it probably is.  Whenever you see profits in the billions, look for the corpse.  In this case, we, the people, are the victims.

It’s difficult to believe that there is such evil.  Those who would gladly sacrifice people for profit, but of course, we know there are.  As stated in an earlier article on this blog, the dangerous additives can cause much worse damage than the mild flu the vaccine is supposed to protect us against.  Again, please, don’t take the shot!

Now, all of us who have been warning so stongly against it are vindicated.  There is a European investigation being conducted and the following videos are from an interview Alex Jones from Infowars did with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, “… german physician. Born in 1947. He studied medicine in Berlin and Hamburg and obtained his medical degree and a doctor´s grade from the University of Hamburg. He obtained his postgraduate qualifications in internal medicine and pneumology, in public health, social medicine, hygiene and environmental medicine in Germany and further training in epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University/ Baltimore, USA.”

Although I cannot fully endorse Infowars, this is a “must see” interview for anyone who has been ‘on the fence’ on this issue.

God bless all of you.  My advice in this age of deception?  Keep your hearts and minds open to the leading of the Holy Spirit and put your faith in God, not man.  Think twice before agreeing to be injected – bottom line is that you may only be a means to an end – the victim of Big Pharma’s greed$$$.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: